Trump Cut NASA Funding. The Sun Fired Back

While Trump's cuts may save Money in the Short-term, they have Long-term Long-tail Consequences

Related articles: NASA’s Contributions to Society, Benefits of Basic Research, Reproducibility in Science, Big Beautiful Bill Spending Cuts, Trump Attacking Government Statistics Organizations, and DOGE Spending Cuts.

The universe has impeccable timing. One month after a proposed science-budget bloodletting, the Sun unleashed its strongest flare of the year, and the atmosphere sealed half the nation inside a pressure cooker. These are not abstract threats; they are live-action demonstrations of cause and effect.

Earlier this spring, the White House released its fiscal‑2026 budget proposal—one that dramatically slashes U.S. civil‑science infrastructure. NASA’s Science Mission Directorate (SMD), responsible for Earth-observing satellites, climate research, and heliophysics, would see its funding drop from $7.3 billion to just $3.9 billion—a staggering 47% cut, accompanied by a reduction of nearly one-third in staff. Other federal science organizations, like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), were also affected by the proposed budget cuts. At NOAA, the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) is facing a near-total elimination, with its budget slashed by 74%.

Before analysts finished reading the fine print, nature delivered a harsh rebuttal. On June 19 at 7:50 p.m. ET, sunspot Region 4114 unleashed an X1.9-class solar flare—a most intense flare. NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) classified it as an R3 “strong” radio-blackout event. The sun flare led to shortwave radio blackouts, especially noticeable across the Pacific Ocean, impacting frequencies below 25 MHz. Amateur radio operators in Hawaii experienced sudden signal loss. This becomes the second solar flare that has been reported from Region 4114 following the X1.2 flare reported on June 17.

Barely 24 hours later, a massive heat dome pushed its way across the Great Plains and the East Coast boxing in temperatures above 100 °F (37.7 °C) for nearly 200 million people. Peak impact states include New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Temperatures in places like Washington D.C. threaten to soar up to 101 °F and New York could eclipse its 1888 record of 96 degrees. Projected heat indices for both cities exceed 105 °F with overnight lows stubbornly hovering above 80 °F—conditions that pose serious health risks to vulnerable populations. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center (CPC) had accurately forecasted the event over a ten-day lead time. Its projections give affected cities the advance warning needed to open cooling centers, ease grid demand, and protect residents.

Both solar flares and lethal heat waves are the very hazards NASA and NOAA were created to monitor. Yet, the funding for these watchdogs is being threatened. However, before budget lines were drawn, the sun has bluntly demonstrated the consequences that might occur if these observational capabilities are curtailed.

What’s At Stake In The Proposed NASA Budget Cut

Source: NASA

The 1,200-page proposed budget document reduced NASA’s budget from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion, a dramatic 24% cut. It also reveals a sweeping rollback: more than 40 current or planned NASA missions would be canceled, mothballed, or left without launch vehicles. This includes ongoing missions like Mars Odyssey, MAVEN, Juno, New Horizons/OSIRIS-APEX, and the Chandra X‑Ray Observatory, as well as future projects such as DAVINCI and VERITAS (Venus missions). Staff reductions—from 17,391 civil‑service posts to 11,853—would hollow laboratories and flight‑operations teams.

NOAA’s cuts are equally draconian. The Oceanic and Atmospheric (OAR) line item shrinks from $656 million to roughly $171 million, shuttering the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (the backbone of U.S. hurricane and extreme‑heat modeling) and zeroing out long‑term climate‑monitoring programs that feed the National Weather Service. Internal memos warn the agency will revert to baseline observation only, meaning satellite data would stream in but never reach the advanced modeling systems that convert numbers into actionable warnings.

Solar Flares and Heat Domes in the Time of Blindness

Solar flares—magnetic explosions on the sun—generate X-rays and charged particles that bombard Earth’s upper atmosphere. These blasts can disrupt high-frequency radio used by airlines and ships, frustrate GPS-based navigation, induce electric currents that threaten power grids, and degrade satellite hardware. The SWPC, one of NOAA’s offices now at risk, operates 24/7 to warn airlines, NASA, the military, and emergency agencies both here and abroad. Without it, we’d be flying blind—literally and metaphorically—amid volatile solar activity.

The 19 June flare follows a pattern: Solar Cycle 25 (a period historically marked by intense flares and geomagnetic turmoil) is running hotter than expected. The NOAA/NASA Prediction Panel forecasted a modest peak of 101.8 – 125.2 monthly sunspots by July 2025; however, the smoothed monthly number already topped 156.7 in August 2024, overshooting the range by more than 30%. Historically, the worst space‑weather calamities—the 1989 Quebec blackout and the 2003 “Halloween storms”—hit at or near solar maximum.

While the Sun was spitting plasma, a dome of high pressure parked over the U.S. heartland, compressing and heating the air mass beneath. Meteorologists call it a heat dome. By 20 June the National Weather Service had placed upward of 170 million Americans under watches, warnings, or advisories; extreme‑heat alerts stretched from Kansas fields to Manhattan fire escapes. Urban night‑time lows refused to drop below 75 °F, exacerbating heat stress for older residents and outdoor workers.

A snapshot of affected cities. Source: NOAA

NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center (CPC) nailed this event ten days in advance by blending data from NASA’s Aqua, Terra and Suomi‑NPP satellites with NOAA’s GOES‑East geostationary platform. The science pipeline is straightforward: satellites capture land‑surface temperature, moisture and cloud‑cover data; super‑computers feed those observations into the High‑Resolution Rapid Refresh and Global Forecast System models; CPC meteorologists translate the output into state and county‑level risk charts. Cut those satellites—or the staff who turn bits into warnings—and response time collapses.

Therefore, weakening the very institutions designed to track these threats borders on irresponsibility. But the FY‑26 budget dismantles key support for these satellite systems, halts CPC model enhancements, and reroutes critical research funds away from regional climate forecasting. The casualty isn’t just embattled programs—it’s the window for early intervention and life-saving action.

What Happens Without The Watchdogs

Power Grids

Shows at-risk capacity (percentage) of extremely high voltage Transforms due to a geostorm centered at 50 degrees N latitude. Much of the US electric grid capacity would be offline. Source: NOAA

Recall the 13 March 1989 geomagnetic storm that knocked out power in Quebec within 90 seconds. That G5-ranked event shut down a transformer, cutting electricity to 6 million people for 9 hours. Today’s much larger and interconnected grid would be vulnerable to cascading blackouts, with economic losses projected in the hundreds of billions. According to the National Academies of Sciences, a Carrington-scale storm today could inflict nearly $2 trillion in US economic damage and leave 20–40 million people without electricity weeks or even months. Civilian space and Earth science efforts from NASA and NOAA are essential in providing early warnings that help grid managers prepare and respond to such events.

Aviation

During the 19 June flare, airlines would have had to reroute polar flights within minutes of SWPC’s R3 alert, adding fuel costs but avoiding total radio silence in high latitudes. In 2023, a similar event caused United Airlines to reroute transpolar flights for safety reasons. Remove the alert by SWPC and risk flips from manageable to disastrous transpolar flights.

Public Health

Heat isn’t just a passing inconvenience. More Americans die from heat exposure each year than from hurricanes, floods, or tornadoes combined. An increase of just 1°F can result in 14% more emergency room visits for heat stroke—an unacceptable margin when predicting deadly conditions. NOAA’s HeatRisk product, a tool developed jointly with the CDC to provide information and guidance for people who are particularly vulnerable to heat, was slated for a full operational rollout—but the recent funding cuts seems to have affected it since its website “is no longer being maintained” and no new data is being added.

Global Impact

On the world stage, U.S. leadership in Earth observation and climate science could evaporate. The U.S. currently owns the largest number of satellites, meaning that it provides the largest share of space-based Earth-observation data worldwide. Reducing or outrightly canceling NASA and NOAA’s missions with these satellites would leave Europe’s Copernicus and Japan’s Himawari-8/9 as primary sources. In October 2024, China launched its fifth Gaofen-12 satellite, adding to its growing Earth-observation system, CHEOS. In other words, the proposed budget cuts could cost the United States—it could pivot from leader to customer, paying for data it once shared freely.

The False Economy Argument

The truth is, these budget cuts amount to a false economy—NASA’s budget makes up just 0.3% of U.S. spending—but any single heat emergency or blackout could negate the entire reduction. In fact, the cost of the proposed cuts could be consumed in just one week of hospitalizations and supply disruptions. A 2020 Congressional Budget Office report put the cost of a nationwide grid collapse due to a solar storm at a trillion dollars—magnitudes more than the entire annual NASA budget.

Some argue private space companies will fill the void. Yet organizations like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Planet Labs are mission-focused on launch services and commercial imaging. They lack both mandate and incentive to offer real-time UV solar photometry, ozone monitoring, or free radio-blackout alerts. The gap becomes farmer-to-coastline gaps without public backing.

Meanwhile, the budget allocates substantial new funding for the military, particularly the Air Force and Space Force, and greenlights $7 billion for lunar exploration under Artemis. But even NASA’s Artemis relies on Earth-observation models and solar weather forecasts to schedule launches and protect astronauts. Investing billions in moon rockets while gutting the backbone that keeps satellites, grids, and communities safe is not just costly, it’s contradictory.

Imagine a Carrington-scale coronal mass ejection (CME) striking in 2026. With SWPC staff cut in half and DSCOVR’s replacement mission canceled, industries would lose hours of early warning. Grid operators wouldn’t have time to reconfigure systems, and a PJM-like interconnection could lose as much as 40 GW at once. Costs could escalate to $1 trillion—this from a proposed budget saving of just $6 billion, a fraction of the Department of Defense’s annual spending.

Political Blowback

The scientific community has voiced sharp disapproval. The Planetary Society warned the reboot would plunge NASA into an “extinction-level event,” squandering decades of investment. NASA’s former chief scientist, Waleed Abdalati, went so far as to label the cuts “impossible to believe.”

As expected, Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, has defended the proposed budget cuts to civilian science explorations, particularly cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and disputed the staff shortages at the National Weather Service. Meanwhile, in a Budget Reconciliation report, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz who is the Chairman of the Senate committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, focused on reinstating the Space Lunch System (SLS) after Artemis III (earmarking $10 billion) and said little to nothing about restoring funding for the cancelled science missions inside Trump’s budget proposal.

However, from Texas to Florida (well-known “red” states) arguments that defunding and understaffing offices threatens lives and businesses have erupted—proof that climate resilience transcends political division. In Texas, Harris County Judge, Lina Hidalgo, and other local leaders explicitly cautioned that reduced NOAA capacity and vacant National Weather Service offices could increase public risk during hurricane season.

Florida meteorologists and former NWS staffers have voiced concern about staffing shortfalls and modeling capability loss ahead of hurricane season. John Cortinas, the former deputy assistant administrator for science at NOAA, said, “I’ve been associated with NOAA for 30 years and I’ve never seen anything like it,” calling it the biggest threat to the agency’s budget and scientific ability he’s ever seen.

Still, all is not lost. Congressional appropriators have pushed back in hearings. Several bipartisan proposals seek to ring-fence Earth science funding. There’s also bipartisan concern for the understaffing of the NWS, with some lawmakers pushing for the exemption of NWS meteorologists from the hiring freeze.

Final Thoughts

Defunding NASA’s and NOAA’s eyes on the sky would not erase solar flares, nor cool the heat domes, nor balance the budget in any meaningful way. It would merely blindfold pilots, grid operators and public‑health officials at the very moment they need sharper vision.

Ultimately, budgets are moral statements. This one says that flashy moon landings defense optics matter more than the unglamorous work that prevents transformers from failing, satellites from frying, and people from overheating. But nature has spoken: the sun roared on June 19 (the second time since June 17), and heat waves are already scorching entire regions. We cannot afford to discard the eyes and ears we’ve built to prevent impeding disasters.

Because the hardest truth is this: nature doesn’t negotiate.

---

Note: This is my own opinion and not the opinion of my employer, or any other organization. This is not a solicitation to buy or sell any stock. My team and I use a Large Language Model (LLM) aided workflow. This allows us to test 5-10 ideas and curate the best 2-4 a week for you to read. Rest easy that we fact-check, edit, and reorganize the writing so that the output is more engaging, more reliable, and more informative than vanilla LLM output. We are always looking for feedback to improve this process.

Additionally, if you would like updates more frequently, follow us on x: https://x.com/cameronfen1. In addition, feel free to send me corrections, new ideas for articles, or anything else you think I would like: cameronfen at gmail dot com.